My current line of thought is that Touch ID on the Retina Mini is a definite no. Supplies are constrained enough as it is, plus keeping it big-iPad exclusive offers a convenient differentiation between the products.
Whether it will come to big iPad or not? I would logically guess yes, but that’s all it is — a guess.
It is interesting that Apple needed to hire a cable engineer for whatever the “something big” project is. Apple tends not to need high-profile engineering talent — they have enough of it already. For example, the purpose of hiring the Hulu executive was to further negotiations with content providers, not to aid Apple’s technological base.
Before the event, the entire tech press had come to the conclusion that the purpose of the 5c was to offer a more affordable version of the iPhone.
This assumption was wrong. The true role of the 5c is now clear. It was necessary because the iPhone 5 had a cost-structure that was too high to allow Apple to keep selling it with a $100 discount, as they have done with every other previous iPhone generation.
As such, they needed to engineer a tweaked iPhone 5 which could be profitably sold on as the mid-tier iPhone for 2013-2014. The 5c exists not to make the iPhone lineup move into a new price-point, but to stand in for the iPhone 5 so that Apple could continue hitting its usual price-points.
Therefore, for another cycle, Apple’s iPhone offerings are available at $450, $550, $650. Just like last year and the year before that. I’m disappointed they didn’t break the mould.
In June, I jotted down my judgement on each iOS 7 app icon. Reminders is a standout failure. Apple hasn’t fixed it, so it’s time to elaborate on why it is worse.
On an iPhone or iPad, the icon is too discreet. The thin strokes and negligible colouring encourage your eye to skip over it because it is so bland. Frankly, it is too white. The other white iOS 7 icons, despite their flaws, ensure they have enough block colour to distinguish themselves. For instance, about a third of the Notes icon is solid yellow.
Even Calendar, arguably the icon that is most dominated by blank space, makes sure the coloured elements are centred in the frame. In comparison, Reminders’ speckles of colour are shoved into the left edge and easily overlooked. At smaller sizes, the bullet point dots become so small and insignificant that the icon might as well be pure white.
I also hate how the icon feels fragile. This is hard to convey in writing, but it really bugs me. For starters, the line rules are about two pixels tall. This sizing should be reserved for unimportant UI separators, not the focal point of your icon. The design language behind iOS 6 understood this, as the icon heavily favoured thicker strokes. The brittle sensation also comes from the fact the lines aren’t evenly spaced. The third rung (the gap between the third and fourth line) is shorter than the others, albeit only slightly. Still, I think the inconsistency is perceptible.
In addition, it is frustrating that Apple crams detail into icons that are overwhelmingly basic. Camera is the biggest perpetrator in this department, but Reminders exhibits the same flaw. For some reason, the bullets are outlined. When large, the icon looks silly because their isn’t detail anywhere else. When small, the detail is too small to not be visible, appreciated or even correctly interpreted.
Well, that’s the “How will people know that I upgraded?” question resolved.
Joking aside, the fact the front of the iPhone 5S is visually distinct from the iPhone 5 is a big deal to normal people. It changes the perception normal people will have about the new phone dramatically.
In addition, it reinforces the fingerprint sensor gimmick factor. Friends will notice people with the new phone and want to see the new feature in action, in the same way onlookers demanded Siri demos when the 4S was brand new.
Marketing the Mac Pro at cinemas is an odd choice, because it means Apple is advertising a niche superuser product to the general public. Looking at the factor of income alone, the majority of movie-goers do not have the funds to dedicate to a machine that is going to have an average price around the $5000 mark.
So why advertise it at highly-concentrated consumer locations?
I have to assume it is for the same reason they bothered revolutionising the Mac Pro in the first place. It’s a propaganda play, punctuated by Schiller’s “can’t innovate anymore my ass” joke at WWDC. With the press presenting Apple as being obsolete, the company has retaliated in the best way possible: announcing a forward-thinking product.
For whatever reason, Apple is yet to release any other ‘innovations’ this year. New products are imminent, of course. But, in the meantime, with an absence of new consumer products to show off, Apple has no choice but to use the Mac Pro as a ‘trophy’ of its supremacy, even if it isn’t as closely-tuned to Apple’s main audiences as it would like.
A lot of hassle in the supply chain for a very little gain, I think. Motorola has gone with “simple” as their guiding message behind this phone, but 504 minor variants of the same thing doesn’t sound very simple to me.
Be bold, make choices. You aren’t going to attract 504x the audience by making 504x editions of a device, so don’t. It’s just a distraction.
That’s a neat workaround, which enables users to at least get a sense of Amazon’s extensive library in the app. Still, it is stupid that these workarounds are necessary in the first place. Apple should backtrack on this rule to, at minimum, let Amazon link to its store on the web.
Oh goody, I can’t wait to have even more whitespace surrounding my 9 icon-at-a-time folder!
A larger iPad is useful only if applications can optimise for the larger screen canvas. The Mini got away with it because it had other advantages ergonomically. A 13 inch iPad, on the other hand, will compete much more closely (in both form factor and use case) with the ultrabook market and needs additional functional utility to be a worthwhile product.
This quarter’s iPhone sales are particularly intriguing. Normally, iPhone US sales are indicative of total sales (which are to be announced on the 24th) but this relationship doesn’t apply anymore. The iPhone is selling disproportionately well in the US compared to other markets, namely Europe and Asia.
I think there is a perception amongst users that Apple is going to follow the trend of previous years and price Mavericks cheaper than Mountain Lion. In effect, the expectation is that Mavericks is going to be $10 (as 10.8 was $10 cheaper than 10.7). However, by bundling iWork as part of 10.9, Apple can justify keeping prices the same this year if they wish.
That’s the Mac story. On iOS, free iWork is a much bigger deal. Even though it is completely irrational, I have seen a lot of people complain that, after purchasing a $500 iPad, they have to purchase a $10 word processor. ‘Including’ Pages with the iPad is a big draw for consumers — it removes a psychological barrier.
This is a proprietary spec at the moment — it isn’t part of HTML5 — but this is the general process for how the web works. Browser vendors implement new features at a rapid pace and then pressure the standards body to ratify it, as the technologies become adopted in websites.
Dalrymple’s review goes as you would expect it does, but I think it’s notable that Apple only felt comfortable seeding builds of OS X, not iOS, for review.
Also, don’t NDA’s seem stupid when Apple freely distributes Mavericks to reviewers, months before its release?