Give Moffat a big enough budget and he can produce some pretty incredible stuff. That episode was great so it’s nice to see the cinema performance reflect this.
Over the last month, a handful of people have asked me whether I like the new iWork or not. I think the best way to respond is to say that iWork represents a tradeoff of a lot of secondary functionality for big gains in very few areas. Liking the product will depend on whether you appreciate the improvements enough to overlook the missing features.
I formed that sentence carefully. I don’t think ‘overlook’ can be substituted for the word ‘outweigh’ here. Big features (like page counts) are absent. If any of these regressions are mission-critical to what you need to do, then — frankly — you are screwed.
When rumours of a re-architected iWork suite surfaced, my primary interest was to see if scrolling had got better. I’m obsessed with responsive scrolling — I crave iOS level performance to be universal on OS X too. At least for me, the culled feature set is not a deal-breaker. Therefore, it’s all worth it. Zooming and panning using the glass trackpad of my MacBook is an absolute joy in the new Pages.
If Apple launches two sizes of smartwatch simultaneously, I don’t think the positioning will centre around gender. That isn’t Apple’s style. Some men will like small watches, some women will like bigger ones. As a society, we don’t know yet what is considered socially acceptable.
When the iPhone launched in 2007, the screen was seen as overly big. In fact, Apple had to use oversized hand models to portray the iPhone as small in the marketing. By 2011, the iPhone’s 3.5 inch screen size was perceived as small.
By starting the iWatch on two sizes, Apple can effectively double its chances of correctly guessing what consumers will consider as fashionable at the beginning of the product roadmap, rather than having to adjust a few generations later.
Compared to tradition, this is an unorthodox way for Apple to launch a premier product. Even hours later, Apple didn’t even put a press release out saying it is now available.
My guess is that the Mini is supply constrained enough that Apple felt too many people would be disappointed if they followed the normal ‘queue-outside-stores’ procedure.
This idea would be stopped well short of animal cruelty concerns. This equipment is meant to be used to teach children about neuroscience. However, most children (and adults) are repulsed by cockroaches. I don’t think any teacher would want them in classrooms.
Killing Bing would be a monumental strategic shift, but I wouldn’t characterise it as stupid by any means. I’ve never truly understood the point of its existence aside from spiting Google.
Dropping (what Bloomberg describes as) other “healthy businesses” is also not a stupid idea in itself. It’s just important to be selective in what you kill of. If you are too overzealous, then the result is a crippled company with no associated benefit.
I would like to think Elop is smart enough to make these choices correctly, but Bloomberg specifically calls out the Xbox as a business to kill. Ending the Xbox project is a step too far, in my opinion. The Xbox is the only thing Microsoft does that has universal appeal. Selling off your most successful division (at least in terms of brand reputation) is an example of being too ruthless.
What I don’t get is why Apple didn’t publish this article at the announcement? They must have known a good proportion of people would be annoyed at the omissions. By only publishing now, they look like they are floundering under pressure.
The iPad Air has been a big hit. Everyone is reporting strong sales statistics. What’s currently not known is if the Mini will be equally successful or whether it has been overshadowed by the bigger iPad in this cycle.
Everpix was a great product — they are shutting down because they couldn’t finance it. Apple could do worse than hire the talent here, if not buyout the company.
Apple messed up by showing the iPhoto and GarageBand icons in iCloud settings prematurely last week. Although not a common occurrence, Apple has leaked stuff through iTunes and iCloud metadata in the past, so it wasn’t entirely without precedent.
What I wasn’t expecting was for them to screw up again and leak the entirety of the new icon set on their own site ahead of tomorrow’s announcement.
The icons themselves look promising. All of the iWork icons actually feel like they were made with iOS in mind. The lucid green Numbers is a little rough, though.
White’s analyst notes should never be taken at face value; his track record indicate that he either has the worst sources in the world or he randomly makes stuff up.
I am only referring to him as a point of discussion. Home automation on the iWatch — or other smartwatches — is an area that hasn’t really been touched upon before. I suppose it is a neat addition. Controlling lights and appliances via your phone is all well and good, but there is a physical barrier to that. As intimate as a phone is, it is normally found stuffed in the depths of a pocket. A smartwatch has inherent advantages in doing small, basic things really quickly.
In terms of implementation though, the reality of Apple getting into home automation is a mess. Customers need new light fittings, new appliances, new plugs, new everything to take advantage of this stuff in addition to the iWatch itself. The system would also need to be contextually driven. With constrained screen real estate, the UI would have to prioritise showing the controllable lights and smart devices that are in close proximity (i.e. the same room) to the user. It’d be tricky to do well, but not impossible.
Due to the additional hardware requirements, though, I feel that this will be an area Apple will cede to third-party developers to solve. Right now, the chance that this is a headline 1.0 iWatch feature — in my mind — is very small.
This is the stupidest thing I’ve ever heard, but I have no doubt that it is true. Microsoft is just stupid. Dual-booting does not solve the underlying problem that Windows Phone isn’t very compelling for consumers.
If you offer somebody choice between Windows Phone and Android on boot, they are going to (perhaps foolishly) pick Android. Dual-booting doesn’t help Microsoft one bit.
Microsoft have already played their trump card, acquiring Nokia. They need to go all in on it, or they are going to lose. They need to reallocate all of the resources tied up in organising manufacturer relationships and focus on building a first-party product.