From the perspective of a smartphone game studio, there is very little incentive to spend the energy converting your game into a WiiU title, when your current market (iOS and, to a lesser extent, Android) dwarfs the number of WiiU customers.
From the perspective of a hypothetical buyer in the market for a games console, there is very little incentive to buy a WiiU based on the fact it has smartphone titles. Demonstrated perfectly by Blackberry, ports never work that well to begin with. They just won’t stand up against the rivalling game selection of Xbox and PlayStation. Moreover, there is a high chance that the prospective customer already owns the game on her phone.
Finally, as you have may have already inferred, from my perspective this sounds like a stupid plan for recovery. I think Nintendo have to admit that they have already ceded the console market. Rather than pleading smartphone developers to convert their apps to WiiU, I believe Nintendo should do the reverse with their own titles.
Please Nintendo, bring your intellectual property (Mario, Pokémon, Zelda) to iOS and exploit the pent-up demand[2] for these brands on mobile.
Barnes and Noble sacrificed profit margins on the Nook tablets to encourage purchases through its stores. With the addition of Google Play to these devices, they are, effectively, giving up that revenue stream as well.
If they weren’t before, Barnes and Noble must be making losses on these products now. Why are they bothering to still sell them?
This is slightly out-of-character. I had the impression Apple thought Finder was the wrong way of thinking about managing applications and files, as highlighted by Lion’s Launchpad and Mountain Lion’s iCloud file storage model.
Tabbed browsing, though, seems to be an enhancement that goes against the grain.
Without actually being part of the company, it is impossible to say whether Jobs was managing correctly (which Caton refutes later in her story), but I think it’s good to be aware of the more-negative perspective on Jobs — straight from the firing line.
Plain and simple, a six-month share price slump is not enough to justify a CEO change, especially when the company runs no debts, posts strong profits every quarter and has no signs of impending financial difficulty.
Marcial is one of Forbes’ “contributors”. From what I have seen, I feel like a more apt title would be “comedians”.
Rather than just showing you a list of social networks, Pocket also shows you people. It makes the experience much more human, rather than the typical dry list of services. This feels like a next-generation interface.
The UI is well done too; the distinction between services and people is made very clear by the iconography. Services are represented by white icons in rounded rect’s, whereas people are depicted by circular-masked profile pictures. The effect is subtle, but has a profound effect in use.
To be effective, video ads require attention. Meanwhile, the News Feed is presented as a stream of scrollable content, which users tend to skim through. It doesn’t seem like a harmonious partnership.